Draft sector metrics
For market consultation and feedback – December 2023
2
Introduction
1 Including the GBF, ISSB IFRS-S1 and S2 standards; TCFD; Carbon Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and Sustainability Accounting
Standards Board (SASB); GRI, CDP and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG); and corporate target setting methods
developed by the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN).
2 Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (2022) A landscape assessment of nature-related data and analytics availability.
The TNFD Recommendations provide companies and
nancial institutions of all sizes with a risk management
and disclosure framework to identify, assess, manage
and, where appropriate, disclose nature-related issues.
This includes a set of recommended metrics to support
organisations’ assessment and disclosure of nature-
related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities.
The Taskforce’s approach to metrics is anchored in the
principles that metrics should be:
• Science-based and provide insights into the
consequences of business and nance activities;
• Be sensitive enough to reect change on an annual
basis;
• Relevant to the business model and value chain
of report preparers, recognising that issues within
sectors, business models and value chains can vary
signicantly;
• Proportionate, reecting the practical capacity and
cost constraints of report preparers to assemble,
assess and report information on an annual reporting
cycle;
• Decision-useful to the primary users of corporate
sustainability reports, oering current insights and
comparability within and across sectors;
• Subjectable to independent limited assurance in
the medium term; and
• Aligned to global and national policy goals
and targets, such as the indicators and metrics
in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity
Framework (GBF) and other international treaties
– as organisations are now aligning to the Paris
Agreement and net zero targets with respect to their
climate-related corporate disclosures – as well as
other standards and target setting frameworks.
1
The TNFD recognises that the scope, consistency
and accessibility of some nature-related data currently
available to some market participants means that
it is challenging to achieve all these principles
simultaneously.
2
To reconcile the large number of
indicators associated with nature-related issues, and the
needs of market participants for a small set of indicators
that can be compared and subjected to third-party
assurance on an annual basis as a key requirement for
disclosure, the TNFD has adopted a leading indicators
approach to measurement.
The TNFD’s metrics approach includes dierent
categories of metrics (Figure 1). These include:
• A small set of core metrics – ‘core global metrics’ that
apply to all sectors and ‘core sector metrics’ for each
sector – to be disclosed on a comply or explain basis;
and
• A larger set of additional metrics, which are
recommended for disclosure, where relevant, to best
represent an organisation’s material nature-related
issues, based on their specic circumstances.
Sector-specic metrics form an important part of this
approach. This reects the diversity of business models
across value chains and their interface with nature
across and within sectors. Sector-specic metrics
help nancial institutions to compare organisations
within the same sector, which often face similar nature-
relatedissues.